Trouvez la route selon la pression du stakeholder.
Un CFO demande où les dépenses Microsoft fuient. Un CIO demande si les Cloud PC sont prêts. Un responsable sécurité demande des preuves. Un MSP demande comment reproduire le travail. Un propriétaire de migration demande pourquoi les applications bloquent encore la livraison. Commencez là.
Trois moments commerciaux, quatorze routes techniques.
Les groupes de solution correspondent à la façon dont les équipes décrivent le problème avant de connaître le nom du produit : preuves de préparation, contrôle opérationnel ou pression de coûts et modernisation.
Posture et préparation
Pour les équipes auxquelles on demande si le tenant, les appareils, les plans Copilot ou le déploiement Cloud PC sont prêts et qui ont besoin de preuves avant que la décision ne soit déjà prise.
Microsoft 365 security and conformity
Microsoft 365 Copilot readiness
ISO compliance and audit readiness
Intune reporting, drift, and device troubleshooting
Windows 365 and Cloud PC
Windows 365 migration
Contrôle opérationnel
Pour les équipes coincées entre licences, offboarding, charge de support, exécution agentic et pression d'audit. EtherInsights fournit les preuves ; EtherAssist aide à faire le travail.
Microsoft 365 licence management and offboarding
SMB AI assistant
IT operations and compliance
Agentic operations
Coûts et modernisation
Pour les équipes portant questions de dépenses cloud, échéances Windows 11, incertitude des apps héritées et pression de livraison MSIX ou AppAttach dans le même programme.
Cloud cost optimisation
Azure VM right-sizing
Legacy apps
MSIX packaging and deployment
Agentic app packaging
Application modernisation and migration
Les quatorze routes
Choisissez la route qui correspond au bloqueur d'aujourd'hui.
Chaque carte part d'une pression que votre équipe ou client peut reconnaître, puis pointe vers la route produit et la prochaine étape pratique.
Cloud cost optimisation
Most organisations do not have a cloud cost problem. They have a visibility and ownership problem. Cloud waste hides across Microsoft 365 licences, oversized Azure resources, idle resources, cloud storage, and reporting gaps, so savings work stalls before action starts.
Azure virtual machines often stay sized for yesterday's peak, an old migration assumption, or a cautious launch window. Finance sees the monthly charge, but IT needs workload evidence, ownership, and a safe action path before resizing compute.
Licence allocation, user lifecycle changes, and offboarding are often handled as separate tasks. That creates shelfware, missed reclaim opportunities, inconsistent access removal, and weak audit evidence when users join, move, or leave.
Security baselines, overlay catalogues, Secure Score, Copilot readiness, and Zero Trust coverage sit across different admin centres, reports, and spreadsheets. Teams struggle to prove conformity against Microsoft's published baselines, CISA SCuBA, or NSA CISS, and drift between assessment and remediation is rarely visible before an audit or incident.
Compliance work slows down when policies, assessments, process evidence, procedures, owners, and audit notes live across documents, spreadsheets, and inboxes. Teams need a controlled way to prepare ISO evidence without turning compliance into a one-off scramble.
Small business owners carry too many repeat questions, admin tasks, policy notes, and customer replies themselves. Generic AI can help, but it often feels too open-ended and does not turn everyday work into reusable business output.
Copilot rollouts stall when sharing, licensing, or labelling gaps only surface at go-live. Readiness signals across licensing, data governance, sensitivity labels, sharing posture, and Purview coverage sit in different admin centres and rarely land in one place before deployment, so remediation happens post-launch when it is slower and more visible.
IT and MSP teams want AI to move repeat work forward, but unmanaged agents create risk when context, approvals, scripts, and evidence are not controlled.
IT and compliance teams face repeat questions, troubleshooting load, documentation gaps, and audit pressure, but generic AI tools create data-control concerns and manual work still absorbs specialist time.
Intune reporting, drift, and device troubleshooting
Intune surfaces device state through separate reports, and tenant configuration drift, failing compliance, patch gaps, Windows 11 readiness blockers, and BitLocker or Defender issues are often discovered one device at a time. Teams rebuild the same evidence for every review, every audit, and every escalation.
Windows 365 programmes stall when design, deployment, configuration, and day-two control each sit in a different admin centre. The Microsoft 365 admin center, Intune, Azure portal, and Windows 365 views each show part of the picture. Cohort design gets compressed, rollout waves hit unclear assumptions, Cloud PC configuration drifts once the estate is live, and migration baselines from Azure Virtual Desktop or older virtual desktop infrastructure rarely join the same operating record.
VDI exits stall when source cloud desktops, users, snapshots, scheduling, and post-migration cleanup are managed as separate manual tasks. Azure Virtual Desktop, AVD personal desktops, standalone Azure VMs, and custom image paths each need validation before they can land safely in Windows 365.
Old line-of-business apps still drive the business, but the install media has been lost for years, the vendor portal is gated or gone, and nobody is sure if the software will run on Windows 11 or a Cloud PC. Migration programmes stall while teams hunt for installers that may never turn up.
MSIX is the modern Microsoft deployment format, but the path from a legacy Windows application to a signed, deployed MSIX is narrow. Installer media is often lost, in-house MSIX skills are scarce, manifest and signing pitfalls surface late, and targets have diverged across Intune (MSIX or IntuneWin), Azure Virtual Desktop AppAttach, and Windows 365 (MSIX or IntuneWin; Windows 365 does not currently support AppAttach).
Application packaging slows when installers are missing, package routes are unclear, and endpoint teams need MSIX, MSI, PowerShell App Deployment Toolkit, and Intune-ready outputs without rebuilding each app by hand.
Legacy applications become migration blockers when installer media is missing, packaging routes are unclear, or teams cannot see the real application footprint early enough in the programme.
Quand une équipe ne peut pas prouver d'où viennent dépenses, dérive, risque, problèmes d'appareils ou demande Windows 365, EtherInsights transforme le parc en preuves et prochaines actions.
Quand les équipes ont besoin de l'aide de l'IA mais ne peuvent risquer prompts lâches, contexte non géré ou réponses non tracées, EtherAssist garde le support day-two gouverné.
Quand les applications retiennent les plans Windows 11, Intune, AVD ou Cloud PC, Forge fait passer l'équipe d'installateurs perdus à packages modernes.