Finden Sie die passende Lösung für Ihren nächsten Schritt.
Geht es um Microsoft-Kosten, Cloud PCs, Sicherheitsnachweise, KI-Governance oder Anwendungsmigration? Wählen Sie den Einstieg, der zu Ihrem aktuellen Problem passt.
Die Gruppen folgen den Problemen, die Teams zuerst nennen: Bereitschaft, Betriebskontrolle oder Kosten und Modernisierung.
Sicherheit und Bereitschaft
Für Teams, die prüfen müssen, ob Tenant, Geräte, Copilot oder Cloud PCs bereit sind.
Microsoft 365 security and conformity
Microsoft 365 Copilot readiness
ISO compliance and audit readiness
Intune reporting, drift, and device troubleshooting
Windows 365 and Cloud PC
Windows 365 migration
Betriebskontrolle
Für Teams mit Lizenz-, Offboarding-, Support-, KI- oder Audit-Aufgaben. EtherInsights liefert Nachweise. EtherAssist hilft bei der Umsetzung.
Microsoft 365 licence management and offboarding
SMB AI assistant
IT operations and compliance
Agentic operations
Kosten und Modernisierung
Für Teams mit Cloud-Kostenfragen, Windows 11 Terminen, Legacy-Apps, MSIX oder AppAttach.
Cloud cost optimisation
Azure VM right-sizing
Legacy apps
MSIX packaging and deployment
Agentic app packaging
Application modernisation and migration
Die vierzehn Routen
Wählen Sie, was heute blockiert.
Jede Karte startet mit einem erkennbaren Problem und führt zur passenden Produktseite oder zum nächsten Schritt.
Cloud cost optimisation
Most organisations do not have a cloud cost problem. They have a visibility and ownership problem. Cloud waste hides across Microsoft 365 licences, oversized Azure resources, idle resources, cloud storage, and reporting gaps, so savings work stalls before action starts.
Azure virtual machines often stay sized for yesterday's peak, an old migration assumption, or a cautious launch window. Finance sees the monthly charge, but IT needs workload evidence, ownership, and a safe action path before resizing compute.
Licence allocation, user lifecycle changes, and offboarding are often handled as separate tasks. That creates shelfware, missed reclaim opportunities, inconsistent access removal, and weak audit evidence when users join, move, or leave.
Security baselines, overlay catalogues, Secure Score, Copilot readiness, and Zero Trust coverage sit across different admin centres, reports, and spreadsheets. Teams struggle to prove conformity against Microsoft's published baselines, CISA SCuBA, or NSA CISS, and drift between assessment and remediation is rarely visible before an audit or incident.
Compliance work slows down when policies, assessments, process evidence, procedures, owners, and audit notes live across documents, spreadsheets, and inboxes. Teams need a controlled way to prepare ISO evidence without turning compliance into a one-off scramble.
Small business owners carry too many repeat questions, admin tasks, policy notes, and customer replies themselves. Generic AI can help, but it often feels too open-ended and does not turn everyday work into reusable business output.
Copilot rollouts stall when sharing, licensing, or labelling gaps only surface at go-live. Readiness signals across licensing, data governance, sensitivity labels, sharing posture, and Purview coverage sit in different admin centres and rarely land in one place before deployment, so remediation happens post-launch when it is slower and more visible.
IT and MSP teams want AI to move repeat work forward, but unmanaged agents create risk when context, approvals, scripts, and evidence are not controlled.
IT and compliance teams face repeat questions, troubleshooting load, documentation gaps, and audit pressure, but generic AI tools create data-control concerns and manual work still absorbs specialist time.
Intune reporting, drift, and device troubleshooting
Intune surfaces device state through separate reports, and tenant configuration drift, failing compliance, patch gaps, Windows 11 readiness blockers, and BitLocker or Defender issues are often discovered one device at a time. Teams rebuild the same evidence for every review, every audit, and every escalation.
Windows 365 programmes stall when design, deployment, configuration, and day-two control each sit in a different admin centre. The Microsoft 365 admin center, Intune, Azure portal, and Windows 365 views each show part of the picture. Cohort design gets compressed, rollout waves hit unclear assumptions, Cloud PC configuration drifts once the estate is live, and migration baselines from Azure Virtual Desktop or older virtual desktop infrastructure rarely join the same operating record.
VDI exits stall when source cloud desktops, users, snapshots, scheduling, and post-migration cleanup are managed as separate manual tasks. Azure Virtual Desktop, AVD personal desktops, standalone Azure VMs, and custom image paths each need validation before they can land safely in Windows 365.
Old line-of-business apps still drive the business, but the install media has been lost for years, the vendor portal is gated or gone, and nobody is sure if the software will run on Windows 11 or a Cloud PC. Migration programmes stall while teams hunt for installers that may never turn up.
MSIX is the modern Microsoft deployment format, but the path from a legacy Windows application to a signed, deployed MSIX is narrow. Installer media is often lost, in-house MSIX skills are scarce, manifest and signing pitfalls surface late, and targets have diverged across Intune (MSIX or IntuneWin), Azure Virtual Desktop AppAttach, and Windows 365 (MSIX or IntuneWin; Windows 365 does not currently support AppAttach).
Application packaging slows when installers are missing, package routes are unclear, and endpoint teams need MSIX, MSI, PowerShell App Deployment Toolkit, and Intune-ready outputs without rebuilding each app by hand.
Legacy applications become migration blockers when installer media is missing, packaging routes are unclear, or teams cannot see the real application footprint early enough in the programme.